IMAGINARY READER
Yesterday, I sat
down to write something and a random thought approached me. Who will be
reading what I am going to write?. I thought about some of my friends who
usually read whatever I write and pass comments. Thinking about the imaginary
reader emboldens the writers, I guess. This consciousness can turn reading from
a passive approach towards text to an engaged, reflective dialogue over time.
An author, when
making a decision regarding the writing, is releasing his own mental imagery of
a consumer of his work. This imaginary reader may be more like a group of
readers that are supposed to think a certain way or that share specific ideas
of understanding with the author. The consciousness of writers and readers can
turn reading from a passive approach towards text to an engaged, reflective
dialogue across time. By acknowledging this presence, we come to appreciate
literature as a living conversation rather than something that is solidified.
Adnu asked me one day about this when we were roaming around at night in
Bangalore. We discussed about fiction and nonfiction. That time also I thought about
the fiction writers, whether they had written their works by considering the
imaginary writers or not. The imaginary writers have a fictional birth. The
fictional nature of the imaginary reader has a strong connection with
reader-response theory, which primarily studies a reader's role in crafting the
meaning of a text. Some works highlight the complexities of writing for an
audience that shares some similarities with the author but also has its own
unique differences.
The relationship
between an author’s imagined reader and the actual audience can be unstable at
times. There are instances where readers completely miss the author’s intent,
leading to some wild interpretations. This disconnect between the author’s
fantasy and the real-world audience highlights the nature of how texts
are received and the journey they take once they leave the author’s grasp.
There is a high possibility that literary fiction might consider a reader who
is open to ambiguity and connotative meaning also. Ending this here. Will
blabber more about this when I sit down to write.

Comments